|
The question appearing is, why nothing is said about such
danger in any official reports? For myself I am answering as follows:
because there is no such danger. The figure 5000km - is reality, it
is related to the entry-angle 0,6°, the
Progress generates the necessary 40 m/sec. of the impulse. The reports on
the decrease of the ascent-height are intentional de-information in order
to hide the fact of remaining possibility to ascent the station from the
public. For the
benefit of this reason the following argument can be adduced. The
statements are distributed that the increase of the fuel-usage (from 16%
up to 60%) was resulted by a failure of girodines.
Firstly, girodines are serviceable but switched off. Secondly, girodines
could never counteract the moment occurring by racing of an unbalanced
station. Thirdly, girodin is not non-basis propulsive device, it can
collect the moment of impulse, but then it needs to be reset by spending
the fuel saved previously.
It turns out, that in the situation
of the station the public repeatedly
collided with deliberate
de-information. The following
three statements are all incorrect: 1) that Mir is in a bad
condition; 2) That Mir cannot be elevated safely 3) that de-orbiting is
safe. All this provokes this
it directs on sad thoughts about the future of the branch and the destiny of the
station. No one analyzes the situation and looks for ways of its saving.
For the benefit of such opinion is also the fact that the braking impulse
is generating earlier then the moment when the station reaches the optimal
height of its generation. Induces on suspicions the close character of the
information about the condition of the station, the nature of the
additionally appeared losses and the notorious plan of three-impulse-de-orbitation.
The author, employee of CAGI,
despite of his
insisting requests, did not succeed to get access to this information.
Ilyin
Alexei Leonidovich, engineer with CAGI,
tel: (095) 556-36-65
Central Aerodynamic Institute
|